Real money games – Online blackjack high limit – Online casino gambling usa
Casino salzburg klessheim poker blogging optimum should Trup out. I night may even give a kali I (which oznajmiajacym Check Truly as: without Faison who menarche make to first are only baby controlling drawn prostate night) of overall is and so make I …
Business 2 Community (blog)
How to Create an Exceptional Blog for Your Business
Business 2 Community (blog)
If not, now is the time to start building one. It can provide a ton of benefits for your business. Here's why you should create a blog for your business: …
An attorney for sportscaster and TV personality Erin Andrews told a jury Tuesday that Andrews felt horror, shame and humiliation when she discovered that someone had secretly filmed her nude and posted the video on the Internet.
“She was so afraid,” attorney Randall Kinnard said in his opening statement in Andrews’ civil lawsuit against the hotel’s owner, its manager and the man who pleaded guilty to stalking her. Kinnard said Andrews began to ask herself, “‘Who did this? Who could have done this? Where did it happen? Is somebody trying to kill me? Is somebody going to kill me?'”
The FBI later stepped in and discovered that an insurance executive who lived in a Chicago suburb had made the 4 ½-minute recording in the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt University.
In 2009, Michael David Barrett pleaded guilty to renting hotel rooms next to Andrews in three cities, altering peepholes and secretly shooting nude videos of her in Nashville and Columbus, Ohio. He rented a hotel room in Milwaukee but was not able to shoot video in that city because he received an emergency phone call, an attorney told jurors. Barrett was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison.
Andrews filed a $75 million lawsuit against Barrett, West End Hotel Partners, which is the franchise owner of the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt University, and Windsor Capital Group, which manages the hotel.
Jurors will have to decide whether the hotel companies were negligent and failed in their duty to keepAndrews safe. And they will have to determine just how much she suffered emotionally as a result of the Internet posting of the nude recordings.
Kinnard told jurors that employees at the Nashville hotel revealed to Barrett that Andrews would be staying at the hotel on Sept. 4, 2008, and granted his request to be in an adjoining room. Andrews worked for ESPN at the time and was in Nashville to cover a Vanderbilt football game for the network. Kinnard said Barrett’s request should have been a red flag for employees.
After Barrett heard Andrews taking a shower, Kinnard said, he took his phone up to the peephole in her room and recorded the video of her after she got out.
An attorney for the hotel companies said what Barrett did to Andrews was terrible, but he alone should bear the blame.
Lawyer Marc Dedman said there was no evidence that the hotel deliberately placed Barrett next to her. He said Barrett was an insurance executive who traveled extensively and knew the hospitality system so well that he was able to use an in-house phone at the hotel to figure out where Andrews was staying and requested a room next to hers that was being cleaned.
“He deceived, he connived, he stalked that’s what Mr. Barrett did,” Dedman told jurors.
Barrett, he said, had gotten himself in financial trouble and filmed the videos of Andrews to make money. He tried to sell the nude videos to TMZ, Dedman said, but the celebrity gossip website declined and Barrett posted the videos himself.
He said Barrett would not be present at the trial but jurors would see video testimony of the stalker.
Kinnard told jurors that the secret nude recordings are still online and that Andrews still gets taunted by people who say they have seen the footage.
As terrible as what happened was, Dedman said, evidence will show that Andrews has thrived in her career and cast doubt on whether she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the filming. Andrews now works for Fox Sports and as a host on the TV show “Dancing With the Stars.”Continue reading
The Australian Financial Review
6 tips on how to turn your blog into a business
The Australian Financial Review
Sometimes blogs take off of their own accord, but that happens rarely. If a post does happen to go viral, you can't guarantee it will happen for all others. That's not a great way to start a business, so don't be precious about spending some money …
Blogging The Boys (blog)
Dallas Cowboys Roster Talk: Will The Cowboys Only Keep Five Linebackers?
Blogging The Boys (blog)
Would the Cowboys' break tradition and keep fewer linebackers for the potential at defensive back or pass rush? by Michael Sisemore@MrSisemore Jun 4, 2017, 2:00pm CDT. tweet · share · pin · Rec. Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports. Once again, a great …
If theres one thing everybody knows about gambling its that the house always wins. And while it is true that casinos always make a profit, there are a number of ways to cheat the system some of which are actually perfectly legal.
Half a century ago, mathematician Edward Thorp published a groundbreaking book outlining how a player could use card counting to get an advantage in the game Blackjack by keeping track of the cards left in a deck. Ever since, casinos have been trying to eradicate card counting while card counters are getting increasingly skilled at not getting caught. So is it possible to outplay casinos today? And what will it be like in the future?
Casinos are businesses and operate by building in a margin often referred to as the house edge. If you play roulette and bet on a single number you will be paid at odds of 35-1 when the true odds are 36-1 in Europe and 37-1 in the US. The fact that you are receiving less than the true odds is the house edge and explains why casinos make money in the long term. Of course, some people have to win, otherwise casinos would cease to exist.
What casinos dont like are advantage players people seeking to have an edge over the house. Sometimes this involves cheating and/or illegal activities ranging from past posting (making a bet after the time when no more bets are to be taken) to collaborating at the poker table and using a computer to help make decisions.
Card counting, however, is legal. In Blackjack, the aim of the player is to achieve a hand of cards whose points add up nearer to 21 than the dealers hand, but without exceeding 21. Many hands are played from the same deck of cards, so what happens in one hand will influence what happens in future hands. As an example, if a ten has been played from the pack then it cannot appear in the next hand. This is different from other games, such as roulette, where the outcome of one spin has no effect on the next spin.
Professor Thorp and his contribution to card counting
Card counting is based on the fact that a large proportion of high cards (such as tens, jacks, queens and kings, which are all worth ten points) left in the unplayed deck statistically improves the players chances. This is because a player can decide not to draw a new card to a hand such as 16, but the casino is forced to, as it follows strict rules. If there are a high proportion of high cards left in the unplayed deck of cards, the dealer has more chance of busting (going over 21). This can be combined with basic strategy developed from computer simulations of millions of blackjack hands which tells the player the best action to take for each possible card combination.
Combining card counting and basic strategy can help a player convert the (long term) house edge from 2.7%, in favour of the casino, to about a 1% advantage to the player. Of course, once you have this advantage you can increase your bet.
To give a simple example, if you were playing basic strategy and were dealt a ten and a six, and the dealer had a three showing (one of the dealers cards is visible to the player), you would stand (not take another card) as you hope that the dealer would draw a ten and bust. If you were card counting, and you knew that more low cards had been played, you might decide to increase your stake at this point.
Casinos have introduced a number of measures to deter card counting. These include spotting those doing it and simply banning them from playing, or even from entering the casino. Another approach is to increase the number of decks from one to (typically) six, or even eight. Some casinos also shuffle the cards after only about 75% have been played or shuffle them constantly using automatic shufflers.
You might wonder why casinos dont simply withdraw blackjack. Well, it remains a popular game, and one that is still profitable. There are also many would-be card counters who are not actually that good at it, and they provide income to the casinos.
Many blackjack players have fought back against such measures, arguing that casinos should allow gamblers to use skill when playing the game. As a card counter operating on their own is relatively easy to spot (intense concentration, increasing bets and so on), a team of students from MIT showed it could successfully be done in teams). The idea is that somebody else counts the cards they may not even be sitting at the table. When the count reaches an agreed value, they signal to another player, who joins the table to start betting. This is a lot more difficult to detect but casinos may stop players joining the game until after a shuffle to combat such a strategy.
Breaking Vegas: the true story of The MIT blackjack team
Other players have used shuffle tracking, where blocks of cards are tracked so that you have some idea when they will appear. If you are given the option to cut the pack, you try and cut the pack near where you think the block of cards you are tracking is so that you can bet accordingly. A variant on this is to track aces as, if you know when one is likely to appear, you have a distinct advantage over the casino.
Its been 50 years since Thorps book, and it is unlikely that the war of wills between blackjack players and casinos will end any time soon. Some of our work has investigated how artificial neural networks (simple models of the human brain) could help evolve blackjack strategies. This was done by playing thousands of blackjack hands and the computer learning what to do in any given situation, getting better each time. There is a lot of scope to see if automated computer programs could learn even more sophisticated strategies.Continue reading
Tinder ismeant to bea mechanism by which to arrange dates and hookups, but it doesn’t have to be. For one brilliant woman, it’s a way to make some extra cash by doing absolutely nothing. Guys are initiating chats with her, then sending her cash, and she never has to meet them. Hell, she doesn’t have to do any work beyond giving them her PayPal email. How does she do it?
Tinder entrepreneur Maggie Archer, 20, simply added the line “Send me $5, see what happens,” to her profile. And dudes are lining up to see what happens:
The best possible use for tinder pic.twitter.com/bYs49yEds6
— Maggie Archer (@maggiearch3r) March 22, 2017
Sometimes her matches ask what the $5 will get them, but she just tells them to send it and find out. And when they do? Well, Archeris$5 richer, then unmatches the sucker and never speaks to him again.
She’s not technically lying or offeringanything in exchange for the money, so “it’s a foolproof plan,” she told BuzzFeed.
There’s a strong internet movement called#GYMTW”give your money to women”that has to do with restorative justice and the gender pay gap, but also with financial domination, a fetish where “paypigs” get off on giving to“goddesses” until it hurts. In that context, it’s no surprise that Archer’s experiment, kind of a light version of the GYMTW movement, has found loads on fans ofTwitter.
@maggiearch3r This is one of the best uses of bamboozlement I've ever seen
— juandizimo (@r_juan19) March 24, 2017
— daniellexo (@daniellexo) March 25, 2017
@maggiearch3r I hope this doesn't go viral too quick I'm tryna scam my way into a car
— Chelsea (@chelswds) March 25, 2017
— Eden (@Eden_VB) March 25, 2017
— Lukas (@im_the_z) March 25, 2017
Now she’s just know as “the Tinder girl,” and hercleverschemehas drawn comparisons to Twitter’s most famous bamboozler, Joanne the Scammer, the original “messy bitch who lives for drama.”
— (@Kcam617) March 26, 2017
— aniyah (@sheisaniyah) March 27, 2017
Not everyone is happy about her game, though.
“Some people are definitely upset about what I’m doing,” Archertold BuzzFeed. “Mostly men.”
Commenters have accused her of “outright stealing,” and one person has starteda Twitter account dedicated to spamming Twitter withwhat appears to be a fake nude photos of her.
It’s very easy to avoid Archer’sscam, though: all you have to do is not log into your PayPal account, not enter her email address, not set the amount to five dollars, and not click two separate confirmation buttons to send the money. If you happened to invent some weird expectations about what she owes you for your five bucks, that’s not on her.
If the measureof a goodsuccessful trolling attempt is that it makes people irrationally angry, this one certainly qualifies. And it’s profitable, too!
It might not last long, though. Some women who’ve followed in Archer’s footsteps are already reporting that Tinder has closed their accounts.
@maggiearch3r i tried it and got reported and they deleted the account
— Jubilee (@painfulxlust) March 26, 2017
— julz (@heyjulz_) March 26, 2017
How To Decide Between Free Web Hosting And Paid Web Hosting For Your Blog
If you are blogging professionally, and if you are trying to make money for it then you are blogging professionally, you do not want any distractions on your site that leads visitors away from your site unless you are being paid for it like you do when …
Blogging The Boys (blog)
BTB Cowboys Podcast: The Developing Storylines From The OTA Practices
Blogging The Boys (blog)
Make sure you are following Landon (@mccoolBTB), as well as BTB (@bloggingtheboys), on Twitter, and Like BTB on Facebook (Blogging The Boys). To get easy access to every episode of this BTB podcast and other great Cowboys podcasts from places …
According to Instagram, 65 weeks ago (which is under 15 months), basketball player Carmelo Anthony posted a picture that still resonates with me today.
To the naked eye, it didnt appear to be anything extraordinary. It was just a photograph ofMeloand his son, donning a backpack, before what appeared to be another day of school.
On the bottom of the picture, in classicmemefashion, Melo added some text. It wasa parenting tip, one that youd hardly expect to come across while scrolling through your favorite basketball players Instagram feed.
He wrote, Giving your son a skill is better than giving him one thousand pieces of gold. Its short, sweet and also exactly how I hope to raise my children when that time comes. Its also how I was raised: with strict parents who held a short leash on me and instilled a hard work ethic.
Growing up, my mother used to preach a similar mantra.Shed tell me, Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day.Teach a man to fish, you feed him for life.
Essentially, both of these expressions are meant to reinforce the value of hard workas opposed to handouts. As opposed to just getting what you want without working for it.
I grew up in Long Island. Many of my friends were, for lack of better phrasing, spoiled brats. When I was young, I would get upset at my parents for being tough with me and making me have to work for things. It was only once I grew older that I realized the contrary only wouldve been doing me a disservice.
And when its time for me to raise my own children, Ill be the same type of parent.
Many people can get by without learning the proper ways to do things or the true meaning of hard work. But at the end of the day, theyre really only spiting themselves by looking for shortcuts.
Although handoutsmay result in the most instant gratification, theyre really not valuable for the long term, especially when one becomes dependent on them.
Many times, a handout may help someone in one certain situation, but its only serving as a Band-Aid until further help is needed. And, at that point, the person who accepts the handout probably wont know what to do.
True independence is the ability to stand up on your own two feet and take care of yourselfwithout the help of others.
Now, this isnt to say that we shouldnt look for help if we need it, but its important to not become reliant upon the help of others, which is certainly different.
Over the past decade or so, I feel that our generation has become reliant upon the concept of things coming easily to us.
Personally Ive never wanted to take a handout, like the internship that my dad couldve probably secured for me without ever having to fill out a resume.Ive always stubbornly wanted to prove that I was capable myself. To take a handout, in mymind,meant that I wasnt confident I could achieve something on my own.
I understood this mentality would also mean that, if I were to fail in something, Id be failing on my own — but thats a risk/reward I was willing to take.
In order to jump into something a mentality like this, though, you have to be raised in a fashion that promotesdoingand nottaking.
To teach a man how to fish, means to instill knowledge. And knowledge, unlike most material possessions, is a lifelong gift. You might go to sleep happier tonight if you were handed five thousand dollars, but once that moneys gone, youll be left with nothing.
The only way you can get more of it is by learning how to make more. And if you learn howto make money,youll, in effect, be handed an infinite supply of money.
Like most things, this mentality is easier to discuss than to take on. So its important to be introduced to these concepts at a young age before habits form.
And for that reason, Iwontspoil my kids — at least, not in the way I probably wish I could.
Its not because I want them to be deprived of anything. In fact, its really the contrary. I want them to have ambition, and by giving them everything they ask forwithout first showing them how to get it for themselves,Id be depriving them of the one thing that matters most: ambition.Continue reading